Tag:

苏州夜生活繁华的街道

‘Ancient Work & Scriptures Are Open To Debate’: Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea Of ‘Oversensitive’ Petitioner Against Telecast Of Hindu-Epic Series Vishnu Puran [Read Order]

first_imgNews Updates’Ancient Work & Scriptures Are Open To Debate’: Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea Of ‘Oversensitive’ Petitioner Against Telecast Of Hindu-Epic Series Vishnu Puran [Read Order] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK26 Jun 2020 12:31 AMShare This – xCiting “over-sensitivity” of the Petitioner, the Allahabad High Court recently dismissed a public interest litigation seeking to restrain the re-telecast of Hindu-epic series ‘Vishnu Puran’ on Doordarshan. “We do not consider it proper to act on the apparent over sensitivity of the petitioner who believes in a particular line of thought and finds himself opposed to another…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginCiting “over-sensitivity” of the Petitioner, the Allahabad High Court recently dismissed a public interest litigation seeking to restrain the re-telecast of Hindu-epic series ‘Vishnu Puran’ on Doordarshan. “We do not consider it proper to act on the apparent over sensitivity of the petitioner who believes in a particular line of thought and finds himself opposed to another view or thought being represented in the TV serial of which he is neither a creator nor the participant, but a mere spectator that too with an option to watch or not to watch such a show,” a vacation bench comprised by Justice Sunita Agarwal and Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh observed. The Petitioner, Santosh Kumar Jaiswal had approached the High Court raising objection over representation of certain characters in the show, and had contended that Lord Vishnu and other dieties in whom he had belief were being misrepresented. Rejecting the submissions, the bench was of the opinion that the show was a work of art based on certain scriptures, and merely because it exhibited certain “inaccuracies” could not be a ground to restrain its telecast. The court further said that ancient work such as the Vishnu Puran are “open to debate” and therefore the court could not pass any direction based on the “over-sensitive” approach opted by the Petitioner. “Without allowing for any debate to arise, as is being sought by the petitioner, it is undisputed that the objectionable work is basically a work of art for entertainment. It may be based on certain scriptures or ancient works and therefore it may suffer from inaccuracy and mistakes either deliberate or otherwise. Leaving that possibility apart, ancient work such as the ‘Vishnu Puran’ and other texts are always open to debate and discussion resulting in multiple views arising and being discussed even at the level of religious teachers and people spiritually inclined. That in part is the beauty of plurality that our society practices,” the court said. Accordingly, the PIL was dismissed. Click Here To Download Order Read Order Next Storylast_img read more

Jason Danieley Will Step Into Chicago

first_img View Comments Related Shows We’ve known for some time that he can wear the hell out of a tux, so this seems like a natural fit. Broadway alum Jason Danieley will step into the Ambassador Theatre courtroom as Chicago’s next Billy Flynn. He begins performances on October 13, stepping in for Ryan Silverman, who will depart the production on October 12.Danieley last appeared on Broadway in The Visit. His additional credits include Next to Normal (opposite his wife Marin Mazzie), Curtains, The Full Monty and Candide. He has also recently appeared in Can-Can at Paper Mill Playhouse and Carousel with the New York Philharmonic.The cast currently features Dancing with the Stars victor Rumer Willis as Roxie Hart (through November 1), Amra-Faye Wright as Velma Kelly, Raymond Bokhour as Amos Hart, NaTasha Yvette Williams as Matron “Mama” Morton and R. Lowe as Mary Sunshine. Chicago from $49.50last_img read more

FA drag FIFA to court over Chelsea transfer ban

first_imgRelatedPosts Mane double eases Liverpool to win over 10-man Chelsea EPL: Chelsea, Liverpool in cagey duel Super Eagles soar on FIFA ranking The Football Association will battle FIFA in court next month over its punishment in relation to Chelsea’s transfer ban.The FA are challenging the disciplinary process and the accusation that there was mismanagement in the registration of minors. The case will be heard by the Court of Arbitration for Sport on June 26.“The FA has cooperated fully with FIFA’s investigation. As this is an ongoing legal process it would not be appropriate to comment further at this time,” an FA spokesperson told ESPN.In February 2019, Chelsea were sanctioned for breaching 150 regulations regarding the transfer and registration of 69 players under the age of 18 over several seasons.The FA were also found guilty of breaking rules regarding the registration of those players and at the time, was “given a period of six months to address the situation concerning the international transfer and first registration of minors in football”.Both parties were also fined with Chelsea banned for signing players in the subsequent two transfer windows. The Blues had that sanction reduced to one window on appeal in December, when their original £460,000 fine was halved to £230,000.The FA also had their fine reduced from £421,000 to £290,000 on an initial appeal and which they are now seeking to appeal further.At the time, the FA said it would “continue to work with FIFA and Chelsea in a constructive manner to address the issues which were raised by this  ”.Sources have told ESPN that Chelsea and the FA have argued a lack of clarity in FIFA’s guidelines contributed to inadvertent rule breaches.Tags: ChelseaFIFAFootball AssociationTransfer banlast_img read more